Hi
The racing series I run in will only allow control of advance based on engine speed. Can anyone tell me if there is a problem with using MJLJ with a 2D map? Presumably the TPS version would be needed with a fixed resistance instead of the TPS or just the wire connecting the two terminals?
Thanks
Tony
2D mapping
Moderators: JeffC, rdoherty, stieg, brentp
Use a TPS unit, connect pin 9 to earth.
To make sure there's no problems, it's best to put the same advance values in every row on the map - i.e. different advance for each rpm bin, same advance values (at each rpm) for each load bin
eg
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
PS don't use this map - I made it up!!
To make sure there's no problems, it's best to put the same advance values in every row on the map - i.e. different advance for each rpm bin, same advance values (at each rpm) for each load bin
eg
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30
PS don't use this map - I made it up!!
I'm running mine in 2D at the moment as I haven't yet installed the TPS. I've left the TPS input unconnected, but then written a custom 'load axis calibration' table with a load value of 95 for each ADC value (just use a text editor and create a file with 256 lines of '95'). When running, it then uses the bottom line of the map irrespective of ADC value (as they are all mapped to a load value of 95). Also, when cranking it will use the top left cell, so you can put a low cranking advance there if desired, which it will use when rpm<457. Above this rpm, it will use the bottom line of the map. Works fine on my Xflow (in a Westfield).
Rich.
Rich.
-
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 2:14 pm
- Contact:
Re: 2D mapping
That's a very odd rule! Even the standard mechanical distributor found on most older engines uses both engine speed and vacuum (engine load) to set the ignition, even if it doesn't do it very well.westfield wrote:Hi
The racing series I run in will only allow control of advance based on engine speed. Can anyone tell me if there is a problem with using MJLJ with a 2D map?
I used a 2D MJ map for a while, until I was ready to go 3D. If your interpretation of the rules is correct, you may have to put a resistor across the TPS input, but then I'd guess that you'll have to persuade a scrutineer that you won't change it back! Get him to put an official seal on the plug, or something.
Good luck!
David
Re: 2D mapping
IIRC most racing engines with a dizzy (and competition dizzys) don't have the vacuum advance plumbed in anyway since the engines tend to operate at high rpm and/or full throttle where the vacuum is very small and the dizzy isn't able to take it into account (mechanical stiction etc) anyway.david jenkins wrote:
That's a very odd rule! Even the standard mechanical distributor found on most older engines uses both engine speed and vacuum (engine load) to set the ignition, even if it doesn't do it very well.
...you may have to put a resistor across the TPS input, but then I'd guess that you'll have to persuade a scrutineer that you won't change it back! Get him to put an official seal on the plug, or something.
Good luck!
David
As regards the average scrutineer, unless you're going to show product specs and wiring diagrams (and he/she understands them!), then they will have to take your word for it. If anything, my suggestion of just connecting pin 9 to a solid earth would be preferable as it's easier to mark with paint etc.
...or use the 10 position switch and set the rows to eg
10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10
12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12
14,14,14,14,14,14,14,14,14,14
16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16
etc
...there's got to be something around a given incline, gear and/or rpm and switch-selecting the different rows to derive the best advance to put into a final map - I just can't get my head around what though...
10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10
12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12,12
14,14,14,14,14,14,14,14,14,14
16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16,16
etc
...there's got to be something around a given incline, gear and/or rpm and switch-selecting the different rows to derive the best advance to put into a final map - I just can't get my head around what though...
