I am thinking about converting to Megajolt and i'm not sure whether to go for MAP sensor or TPS.
I have a 1380, weber 45, 296 cam and i'm not sure if that would give uneven pressure for the MAP sensor.
I would prefer to use MAP as it's easier to set up.
Thanks,
Mark.
MegaJolt on a mini with Weber 45
Moderators: JeffC, rdoherty, stieg, brentp
Hi Mark,
Sounds like you've read the MAP vs. TPS topic http://www.autosportlabs.net/index.php? ... MAP_or_TPS ?
Sounds like you might be right at the edge with the cams you're running. Is your idle very lumpy or uneven? You could also check with the manufacturer of those cams to see what they might think about the vacuum stability at idle.
Another option is to create a large vacuum reservoir to smooth the pulses from each runner, and then reference the MAP sensor from that reservoir.
Sounds like you've read the MAP vs. TPS topic http://www.autosportlabs.net/index.php? ... MAP_or_TPS ?
Sounds like you might be right at the edge with the cams you're running. Is your idle very lumpy or uneven? You could also check with the manufacturer of those cams to see what they might think about the vacuum stability at idle.
Another option is to create a large vacuum reservoir to smooth the pulses from each runner, and then reference the MAP sensor from that reservoir.
Exactly what I'd suggest. THIS enclosure should be fine. Fit three bulkhead connections to this and run a hose from each inlet runner to the box, then one from the box to the MJLJ. The box then becomes an accumulator to dampen the vac signal as the MAP sensor sees it.brentp wrote:Another option is to create a large vacuum reservoir to smooth the pulses from each runner, and then reference the MAP sensor from that reservoir.
HOWEVER I know of a guy that was running a Weber on his 1293 Mini with 11-1 CR and a Kent 310AGSP cam with the simple tee-peice setup shown above.