Rover 3.5 + SU's - MAP takeoff point?
Moderators: JeffC, rdoherty, stieg, brentp
Rover 3.5 + SU's - MAP takeoff point?
Guys,
I have ordered my Megajolt (MAP, not TPS) and am eagerly anticipating its arrival. I have everything else ready so am thinking about how i am going to go about installing it all.
The vehicle is a Landrover 90, and it is fitted with a 3.5 rover v8 running SU's. This is to be changed for EFi later, but for now i have the SU's, so have to deal with them...
So my question is this:
What am i best doing in terms of tapping into the inlet manifold for the map reading? Tapping into all 8 branches is going to be a nightmare and look pretty messy, so can i get away with only doing a couple? What would happen if i took the reading from where the brake servo takes its vacuum? I assume that this would mess up the MAP reading when you applied the brakes and vacuum dropped?
Current view of engine bay
Bare-naked manifold
Shot of the manifold plus carbs on installation
My baby (with my Dad hanging off the trailer)
Thanks!
I have ordered my Megajolt (MAP, not TPS) and am eagerly anticipating its arrival. I have everything else ready so am thinking about how i am going to go about installing it all.
The vehicle is a Landrover 90, and it is fitted with a 3.5 rover v8 running SU's. This is to be changed for EFi later, but for now i have the SU's, so have to deal with them...
So my question is this:
What am i best doing in terms of tapping into the inlet manifold for the map reading? Tapping into all 8 branches is going to be a nightmare and look pretty messy, so can i get away with only doing a couple? What would happen if i took the reading from where the brake servo takes its vacuum? I assume that this would mess up the MAP reading when you applied the brakes and vacuum dropped?
Current view of engine bay
Bare-naked manifold
Shot of the manifold plus carbs on installation
My baby (with my Dad hanging off the trailer)
Thanks!
1984 3.5 LR 90
1959 2.25 LR Series 2
1959 2.25 LR Series 2
On the inlet manifold, the "lump" the two carbs bolt to is an ideal place to tap for take-offs. If the carbs feed a separate bank each (I forget how the stock RV8 manifold works), then one union fitted after each carb, to a small reservoir, then off to the ECU would be perfick.
On your second pic, there's a hose fitted just to the front of the carbs, somewhere there is ideal.
On your second pic, there's a hose fitted just to the front of the carbs, somewhere there is ideal.
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 11:39 am
this pipe going to your dizzy is the vacuum advance... its just a vacuum pipe from the carbs i would just use this as you won;t need it using megajolt... any area behind the throttle plate will give you the same pressure reading as it the throttle plate that allows air to pass into the manifolt (as you probably know), so you can drill and tap a hole if you want or just use the exsiting vacuum take off from the carbs....hope this helps
- Attachments
-
- adjust.JPG (85.21 KiB) Viewed 14088 times
I get a stable MAP reading from the stock take-off point on my SU HIF44 carb.Quagmire wrote:Thanks for the replies guys, i was just asking because i was thinking of using the original vac advance on the SU- but had read that the air was too turbulent in this area to give a good reading? Can anyone confirm?
Rich
I've seen it on other cars, and while it is stable, it's not MAP. Compare them back to back and you'll see what I mean.Midas wrote:I get a stable MAP reading from the stock take-off point on my SU HIF44 carb.Quagmire wrote:Thanks for the replies guys, i was just asking because i was thinking of using the original vac advance on the SU- but had read that the air was too turbulent in this area to give a good reading? Can anyone confirm?
Rich
Gilesy- so is it completely different to MAP, or is it simply a different value that then increases/decreases in line with MAP (sort of like taking a graph of MAP across revs and then simply moving it up or down the y-axis)Gilesy998 wrote: I've seen it on other cars, and while it is stable, it's not MAP. Compare them back to back and you'll see what I mean.
So would the servo take off be any better or should i use the vacuum ports that the rocker covers vent into? My only concern with that would be oil contamination of the map sensor over time...
I would tap into the tower where the carbs attach to the manifold, but am worried about hitting the water jacket in that area.
ThreeSheds- Thanks for the kind words, its not that clean anymore!
1984 3.5 LR 90
1959 2.25 LR Series 2
1959 2.25 LR Series 2
The tower would probably be the best bet - thr problem with the normal carb take-off is that it is too near to the butterfly and gets affected by turbulence and strange and unpredicatable venturi effects as the butterfly opens - apparently (I have not proved this) giving seemingly random fluctuations when compared to the real MAP. It would be a shame to fit a brilliantly controled and predictable ignition setup and then feed it with duff input parameters!
So - Carb take-off no good
Too close to one trumpet/inlet manifold branch no good
If you can find a spot clear of anything that would cause variations stick it there. The tower would probably be brilliant if you can mange it
So - Carb take-off no good
Too close to one trumpet/inlet manifold branch no good
If you can find a spot clear of anything that would cause variations stick it there. The tower would probably be brilliant if you can mange it
-
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:54 pm
- Location: Fareham, GB
The problem with Hif with a built in vacuum port is that it is located on the atmosphere side of the throttle valve. So when the throttle valve is fully closed there is no vacuum pressure and no MAP (Manifold Absolute Pressure). Once the throttle valve is partly open then an increased vacuum can be seen at the vacuum port, as the vacuum is now created between the carb piston and the engines inlet valve. Once the throttle valve is fully open then you can see the same vacuum pressure as when the throttle was fully closed. What you need is a vacuum port anywhere between the inlet valve and the throttle valve. The brake servo vacuum would be good to use. The crankcase breathers wouldn't as agian these are located on the atmosphere side of the throttle valve.
Hope this helps
Hope this helps
1310 A-series Mini, lightened and built myself. V4 board and loving it
Rasputin22 - The Mini Forum
Rasputin22 - MK1 Golf Forum
Megajolt repair for the UK available
Rasputin22 - The Mini Forum
Rasputin22 - MK1 Golf Forum
Megajolt repair for the UK available
I checked this, unless I'm looking at completely the wrong port on my HIF44 it's most definitely on the engine side of the butterfly.NITROPIXIE wrote:The problem with Hif with a built in vacuum port is that it is located on the atmosphere side of the throttle valve. So when the throttle valve is fully closed there is no vacuum pressure and no MAP (Manifold Absolute Pressure). Once the throttle valve is partly open then an increased vacuum can be seen at the vacuum port, as the vacuum is now created between the carb piston and the engines inlet valve. Once the throttle valve is fully open then you can see the same vacuum pressure as when the throttle was fully closed. What you need is a vacuum port anywhere between the inlet valve and the throttle valve. The brake servo vacuum would be good to use. The crankcase breathers wouldn't as agian these are located on the atmosphere side of the throttle valve.
Hope this helps
Rich
-
- Posts: 704
- Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 1:54 pm
- Location: Fareham, GB
Not sure if yours is the same Midas but hopefully the diagram below shows the type of HIF44 i have and also the orientation of the throttle valve and MAP take-off (circled)
- Attachments
-
- MAP Throttle Valve (648 x 486).jpg (92.9 KiB) Viewed 13966 times
1310 A-series Mini, lightened and built myself. V4 board and loving it
Rasputin22 - The Mini Forum
Rasputin22 - MK1 Golf Forum
Megajolt repair for the UK available
Rasputin22 - The Mini Forum
Rasputin22 - MK1 Golf Forum
Megajolt repair for the UK available